Player

Showing posts with label What We Saw. Show all posts
Showing posts with label What We Saw. Show all posts

Friday, January 10, 2025

What We Saw: The Mad Dash (Canadian game show)

In our Facebook group, our pal Charlie posted this bonkers clip from 1979 Canadian game show The Mad Dash. Everything about this amazes me--the graphics, the music, the way you feel right away, "Yes, this is quality low-rent television."


I will say that this is a loop, designed to be mesmerizing, and while it certainly works on me, the actual show is not quite as bonkers. It's still a tremendous watch, or at least this full episode is. Even the thumbnail makes me laugh:



First, let's get the disappointment out of the way. In this episode, there was very little of the random back and forth you see in the first clip. Contestants do dash around a giant track like a real-life Candyland, but they do it with purpose and deliberation, unlike the clip that shows a man and woman just prancing around with no evident direction, often on the verge of falling.

That said, this show is a riot. The host is Pierre Lalonde. Pierre Lalonde! We get two mixed-gender teams (Can we call them couples? The actual people seem to be both coy and not coy about that at the same time when Pierre asks) who compete for cash--not much of ii--and prizes. One representative of each team stands around a simulated dice table and answers questions, then rolls a die that dictates the movement of their partners on that goofy track. Each space has some associated prize or action. Oh, and you had better believe that everyone is dressed like the late Seventies, baby!

This episode seems like a debut or a very early episode. The direction is amateurish at times. At the beginning, when we meet the players, their backs are mostly to the camera, and we barely see one of them. The main gimmick of the game is seeing someone frolic on that track, yet each time it happens, the show cuts late and we miss the first step. Even Pierre Lalonde--it pains me to say this--forgets a few things. Plus, near the end, when he is counting out the whopping total of $110 in cash to the winners, there is an awkward moment when he says something like, "Let me take this 20 back and give you this." You never see Jim Lange making change on Name That Tune.

The questions are basic trivia material, but the contestants go for it with gusto, especially the ladies. Loretta in this clip seems right out of game show contestant casting, making a running commentary the whole time and reacting to everything. In the beginning, her hapless partner Jim rolls a 3, which means she has to go tot eh "Back 3 Spaces" square and return to the starting point. She pouts in a friendly sort of way that she actually has to go through the motions of walking it out. 

There are multiple awkward moments like this that you don't often see in more polished game shows. Sure, you get bloopers all the time on, say, Family Feud, but you don't see ill-conceived spots like when the woman on the track, after choosing "Brawn" over "Brains," attempts the physical challenge of...peeling two oranges with her bare hands in 15 seconds? Not only is it not even captured well visually, there isn't any kind of timer on the screen. The whole thing just ends, and everyone laughs it off and goes back to the trivia, die rolling, and dashing.

Is the dashing MAD? No, but it sure is goofy, and that is good enough for me to want to see more examples of this. The book TV North calls it a syndicated show from 1979, but the credits clearly show it was on CTV, and Wikipedia says it ran from 1978-1981. A few full episodes are on YouTube. Someone salvage the rest and put them up!

Wednesday, March 13, 2024

What We Saw: The 1984 Academy Awards

I wasn't feeling a strong connection to the 2024 Academy Awards, so with the help of YouTube, I went back in time and watched the 1984 Academy Awards this weekend. What is funny is that by choosing a nice round number for the anniversary--40 years ago!--I picked a night that celebrated a crop of movies with which I connect even less.

Before I address that, let me share the one thing that stands out to me most when watching the Oscars of 40 years ago. It's not the greater star power. I could comment on that, but it would be "grumpy old man out of touch with today's movies" kind of stuff, and I don't want to rip on today's crop of influencers--er, stars. Besides, they gave us exactly the kind of star I might yearn for, Al Pacino, and that didn't turn out so well.

"HOO-HAH! I SEE OPPENHEIMER!"

No, the one thing that stands out today is the lack of reaction shots. It is noticeable throughout the entire program, but check out the opening, which contains the best part of the night, Johnny Carson's monologue:



Current awards shows have the tendency to find someone faking a smile or doing a mock pout (or, OK, I concede it happens--showing genuine emotion) after just about every single bit. It's not even every bit, but lines within a bit if presenters are on stage. Look at how, during Carson's segment, the director shoots it like a talk show monologue. The camera is on him almost the entire time. It's almost alarming! Yet I find it refreshing. I like the emphasis on the host and, throughout the ceremony, the people on the stage.

There aren't a lot of great moment for me in this show because I STILL haven't seen most of the big winners, and, boy, you can bet I didn't see them yet. This Oscar night illustrates how the movies of 1983 are a big gap for me. I never saw Terms of Endearment, Tender Mercies, Fanny and Alexander, The Dresser, and even--gasp--The Right Stuff (haven't seen it straight through all the way). I have never seen Silkwood nor Yentl (I actually tried to avoid that one when it was on HBO all the time in the Eighties) nor Educating Rita nor Cross Creek. Therefore a lot of the winners and races don't resonate with me much 40 years later.

Here are some movies of 1983 I DID see: Return of the Jedi, Flashdance, Trading Places, WarGames, Octopussy, Staying Alive, Sudden Impact, Mr. Mom, Risky Business. Those happen to be the other 9 of the top 10 movies (excluding Terms) of 1983. I am not making a popular vs. critical darling argument, just pointing out that I did see a lot of the movies of that year, but somehow I missed most covered at the Oscars. 

I would be more excited about Local Hero, King of Comedy, or others if we are talking critical faves. If we are talking person faves, well, young me saw Superman III and National Lampoon's Vacation.

I am not saying what the Oscars SHOULD HAVE honored, just that I don't have an affinity for what the show did honor. But would it have killed them to nominate Private School so Phoebe Cates could get an invite?

Shirley McLaine's speech is well remembered (Is it one of the first commenting on how long the show is?), and many of the "lesser" awards yield sincere and affecting (if not starpowered) speeches.




Actually, one thing that strikes me is how Carson makes multiple jokes about how people don't really care about those awards--maybe right on the edge of going to insulting. Carson himself is a clear highlight in his final outing as emcee. He is funny, appealing, and always in control.

A highlight is Cary Grant's appearance. Talk about class and star power!




Overall, it was not a great show, but it was a nice watch on a lazy Sunday...broken up into multiple clips in a convenient playlist. Seeing the 215-minute long ceremony at once without breaks might be a bit too much, at least without bigger roles for the likes of National Lampoon's Vacation (To be fair, Christie Brinkley does appear as a presenter).




Tuesday, November 1, 2022

What We Saw: Vincent Price's Dracula (1982)

As part of our Halloween-watching festivities this holiday season, Laurie and I enjoyed this TV special, which I believe was produced in Canada and aired in first-run syndication in the 1980s:



This and other uploads of the program list the airdate as 1982, which matches the info in the show's credits, but for some reason IMDB says it's from 1986. The special feels like mid 1970s to early 1980s; the documentary feel with the type of recreation footage puts you in the mind of watching a film in school during that era--albeit a really cool one!

Narrated and hosted by Price, the hour looks at the historic background of one of the models for Bram Stoker's Dracula, Vlad the Impaler. It also looks at portrayals of vampires in culture through the years, including various film clips. Of note is that there are no clips from Dracula (1931) nor any other Universal movies. Some of the footage appears to be repurposed from a fictional film project.

Price does exactly what you want him to do, and the special strikes just the right tone in balancing his playful presentation with archival material and recreations. Yes, I am posting this "a day late," in a sense, but shouldn't every day be a good time to see a Vincent Price special?




Thursday, February 24, 2022

What We Saw: TLC (1984 NBC unsold pilot)

The Museum of Classic Chicago Television YouTube account continues to bring us fantastic rarities and interesting broadcasts, almost always with original commercials and presented as originally aired. One that struck my eye was the unsold pilot "TLC," a sitcom set at a nursing university in Philadelphia:



Jim Vallely and Jonathan Schmock went on to all sorts of things, including behind-the-camera work on Arrested Development and Real Time with Bill Maher, respectively, and were in other shows, but who else remembers them as one of the weirdest comedy teams of the 1980s, The Funny Boys?  After this effort failed, they joined the cast of another NBC show, Double Trouble, presumably to up the zany in that sitcom's second season.

Double Trouble, then in reruns of its first season, kicked off this August night, followed by repeats of Jennifer Slept Here (shout-out to our Facebook group) and The Facts of Life. Then St. Elsewhere followed this broadcast of TLC

CBS had an episode of newsmagazine The American Parade and a rebroadcast of movie Bare Essence, which had been picked up as a primetime soap and failed already on NBC.

If this sounds like NBC and CBS burning off programming, well, it is. Not only is it August, but ABC was showing the popular 1984 Summer Olympics from Los Angeles this week.

As for TLC, it's kind of an odd piece. Some of my thoughts:

*The fact that the Funny Boys are the first and only male enrollees isn't emphasized the way you'd think it is. You'd think they would really hammer that point home.

*That said, Mary Garripoli as the love-starved student fixated on Vallely's character ought to have given royalties to Wendie Jo Sperber from Bosom Buddies.

*Jessica Walter seems to be enjoying herself as the heel dean with a heart of gold. 

*It's funny to see Ritch Shydner cast as a musclehead!

*There are some moments that hint at something, but things seem to happen too quickly in this pilot, almost like we are seeing a drastic cutdown of a longer episode.

Thanks again to the Fuzzy Memories account for bringing such cool stuff on a regular basis!

Tuesday, January 25, 2022

What We Saw: "One of the Boys" (1982)

 In this week's Top Ten, we marked the 40th anniversary of the premiere of One of the Boys, a flop starring Mickey Rooney and a young Nathan Lane and Dana Carvey. I can't let it go, though! Sadly, the only full episode online that I can find is this one:

Watching it is almost a disappointment. It's not laughable. It's not over-the-top embarrassing. It's just...bad.  I hoped to see more evidence that, "Ah, yes, here is where we can tell The Mickster was a jerk to Carvey."


But instead it just seems like the whole thing falls flat. It's amazing that two prolific sitcom writers (Saul Turtletaub and Bernie Orenstein) could create a show so devoid of jokes--and I mean attempts at jokes, let alone good jokes.

Here is what TV Guide said in 2002 when it called this one of the 50 Worst Shows of All Time:




Monday, April 2, 2018

Bouton, Bay City Blues, and...beer? The What We Saw minisode playist is live!

We have created a YouTube playlist for our fresh bonus episode looking at What We Saw.  In this playlist, see some of the only online footage of Ball Four, see more of ex-MLB pitcher Jim Bouton, and pay tribute to the late Steven Bochco by checking out Bay City Blues.

Oh, and did we mention another appearance by the semi-official beverage of the podcast? That's right, another Lowenbrau ad! Click below to start the clips or visit our official YouTube page for this and many more episode-specific playlists!

Thursday, March 29, 2018

What We Saw: Ball Four

Just in time for Major League Baseball opening day, we revisit another What We Want to See segment now that we've seen it. This time, Mike saw an episode of "Ball Four," the baseball sitcom based on Jim Bouton's book of the same name. Will the players really spend "A Quiet Day at the Iroquois Hotel"? Will their antics live up to the real ones Bouton described in his book? Will that one guy ever go to the bathroom? Find out on What We Saw!



Check out this episode!

Thursday, March 1, 2018

What We Saw: Year At the Top

In this bonus minisode, we discuss seeing a show we once wanted to see, Year At the Top. Greg Evigan and Paul Shaffer sell their souls to rock and roll with help from Mickey Rooney! Mike saw an episode, Rick has a lot of questions, and Mike has some surprising answers.


Check out this episode!